8 results
The evaluate which treatment of mallet fingers is better, the conventional mallet therapy via the hospital or the personalized treatment with intensive follow up via the handencentrum. This will be investigated for mallet fingers caused by an…
To assess whether there is a difference in the outcome in treatment of acute mallet fingers (exist <2 weeks) compared to chronic mallet fingers (exist > 4 weeks), using the same protocol of intensive follow-up by the '…
Primary objectivesPart A of the study (if applicable):1. To assess the safety and tolerability of selinexor added to standard induction chemotherapy for AMLand select the feasible dose level for part B of the study2. To assess in a randomized…
In the present study, we set out to evaluate arterial wall inflammation in patients at increased CV-risk with statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS), precluding effective statin therapy. Following twelve weeks of treatment with PCSK9-Ab, the…
Part I: Evaluate the safety and tolerability of selinexor at 3 different dose levels in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone & determine recommended dose level (RDL) of selinexor for Part IIPart II: Evaluate the efficacy of the…
To assess arterial wall inflammation, measured with 18F-FDG PET/CT scan, in patients with intermediate and severe FH phenotype, as well as the change in arterial wall inflammation following PCSK9 inhibition.
The aim of this pilot study is to further unravel the pathophysiologic mechanism of NS-induced hypercholesterolemia which willfurther guide the treatment of patients with NS.Given the recent insights on PCSK9-ENaC inhibition, our hypothesis is that…
The primary objective of the study is to compare the PFS of SPd versus EloPd in patients with MM who have received 1 to 4 prior anti-MM lines of therapy and never received pomalidomide, selinexor, or elotuzumab. Patients must have had prior…