8 results
The main objective in this study is to examine if there is a difference in coagulation between Ringerlactaat/Gelofusine® priming and Ringerlactaat/HES 130/0.4 priming after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), by measuring the thorax drain…
To investigate the safety of a 6% HES solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in trauma patients.
Primary objectiveTo compare the effect on pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of an initial triple oral regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, selexipag) versus an initial dual oral regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, placebo) in newly diagnosed, treatment-…
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage Primary Objectives· To assess the safety and tolerability of the combination treatments of oral AG-120 when administered with subcutaneous (SC) azacitidine and oral AG-221 when administered with SC azacitidine in subjects…
To assess efficacy and safety of ivosidenib/enasidenib vs. placebo in combination with induction therapy and consolidation therapy followed by maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic…
Primary Objective:* To compare event-free survival (EFS) between AG-120 + azacitidine and placebo + azacitidine. Key Secondary Objectives:* To compare the complete remission (CR) rate between AG-120 + azacitidine and placebo + azacitidine. EFS is…
To investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
The primary objective of this study is to:• Determine the safety and tolerability of AG-120 and AG-221 when administered with induction and consolidation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an isocitrate…