8 results
The main objective of the present study is to investigate whether the ORSIRO coronary stent is non-inferior compared to the Xience coronary stent in patients with total coronary occlusions.
To evaluate patient related outcomes mainly quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Side effects and therapy adherence were also evaluated because these can interfere with quality of life and treatment satisfaction.
The objective of the ABSORB PHYSIOLOGY is to evaluate the following in participants undergoing coronary artery scaffolding/stenting for significant coronary artery disease:• The acute (post-implantation) effect of an implanted BVS or mDES on…
To test the non-inferiority of the Synergy* abluminal coated everolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Boston Scientific compared to the Nobori* abluminal coated biolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Terumo in the…
Objectives1. Reduction of defect size after MMS with a pre-treatment with imiquimod 5% cream2. Reduction of tumour size of large nodular facial BCC, after pre-treatment with imiquimod 5% cream.3. Improvement of cosmetic results.4. Histological…
Primary objective: To compare long-term efficacy of curettage prior to IMQ 5% cream (Aldara®) therapy versus standard surgical excision in primary nBCC.Secondary objective: To assess compliance, pain, cosmetic outcomes, patient satisfaction, patient…
This protocol will compare clinical outcomes of the SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE drug-eluting stents in a broad patient and lesion population and will gain substantial additional information on patients in a real world setting. These data will also provide…
Primary objectives: 1. To assess the effect of experimental immunization with GA2 sporozoites by mosquito bite with and without co-administration of different adjuvants on the pre-patent period after controlled human malaria infection (CHMI).2. To…