5 results
The main objective of the present study is to investigate whether the ORSIRO coronary stent is non-inferior compared to the Xience coronary stent in patients with total coronary occlusions.
The objective of the ABSORB PHYSIOLOGY is to evaluate the following in participants undergoing coronary artery scaffolding/stenting for significant coronary artery disease:• The acute (post-implantation) effect of an implanted BVS or mDES on…
To test the non-inferiority of the Synergy* abluminal coated everolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Boston Scientific compared to the Nobori* abluminal coated biolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Terumo in the…
The objectives of the trial are to assess whether ABT-414 alone or in combination with TMZ improves overall survival (OS), PFS, tumor response, quality of life, NDFS and steroid use compared to standard treatment with lomustine single agent or TMZ…
This protocol will compare clinical outcomes of the SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE drug-eluting stents in a broad patient and lesion population and will gain substantial additional information on patients in a real world setting. These data will also provide…