6 results
The evaluate which treatment of mallet fingers is better, the conventional mallet therapy via the hospital or the personalized treatment with intensive follow up via the handencentrum. This will be investigated for mallet fingers caused by an…
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety of 12 weeks of treatment with ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333 with and without RBV, and to show the non-inferiority in SVR12 rates (the percentage of subjects achieving a 12-week…
To assess whether there is a difference in the outcome in treatment of acute mallet fingers (exist <2 weeks) compared to chronic mallet fingers (exist > 4 weeks), using the same protocol of intensive follow-up by the '…
The primary objectives of this study are to compare the percentage of subjects achieving SVR12 (HCV RNA < lower limit of quantification [LLOQ] 12 weeks following treatment) of 12 weeks of treatment with ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333 co-…
Analyze whether application of a theoretical reasoned and tested system with test subjects is preventive and costs effective.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of response to treatment (assessed by SVR12 status) on the long-term progression of liver disease in adults with chronic HCV GT1 infection who received treatment with ABT-450/…