12 results
See page 9Primary Objective:The primary objective of this study is to explore the relationship between MPH and academic activity and the mediating roles of ADHD behaviours, cognitive deficits and motivational deficits in this relationship. Therefore…
Primary Objectives:• To investigate the effects of a stable level of alcohol (0.6 g/L) on fMRI activation patterns in healthy male volunteers,• To investigate the effect of a stable level of morphine (80 nmol/L) on fMRI activation patterns in…
To establish the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose of the coadministration of LDE225 and INC424 in patients with MF, who have not previously received therapy with a JAK inhibitor
Primary Objectives:• Part 1: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin and select a dose for further evaluation• Part 2: To evaluate and compare the overall survival of subjects with nonsquamous…
Primary: To estimate the MTD and/or RDE for each of the following three treatment arms in patients with myelofibrosis.* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* Ribociclib (LEE011) plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib and Ribociclib (LEE011…
Primary Objectives:- To evaluate and compare the overall survival (OS) of subjects with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas when treated with JAK 1/2 Inhibitor in combination with capecitabine versus capecitabine alone.Secondary…
Earlier research nas shown the emerging efficacy and safety profile for INC424, which supports further studies in PV subjects who demonstrate resistance or intolerance to HU therapy [Barosi et al.2009]. This pivotal phase III trial (CINC424B2301) is…
The purpose of the study intends to assess safety, activity and pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib treatment with corticosteroids in treatment-naïve and steroid refractory (SR)- acute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) patients aged *28 days to <…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with grade II-IV steroid refractory- acute graft vs host disease assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Day 28.Secondary:…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with moderate or severe SR-cGvHD assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Cycle 7 Day 1 visit.Secondary: To compare the rate…
To assess the rate of complete response (CR) in Grades III and IV SR-aGVHD participants on Day 28 postrandomization.
To characterize the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of each combination partner used with ruxolitinib (Part 1)To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of each novel ruxolitinib combination treatment arm (Parts 2 & 3)