9 results
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BIBF 1120 in HCC patients without prior systemic treatment as compared to Sorafenib.
- To asses the safety and toxicity of peri-ablative sorafenib given in doses of either 200 mg or 400 mg twice daily.- To asses the effect of perioperative sorafenib on the RFA induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells and cytokines…
To determine whether addition of selexipag to current PAH therapy improves exercise capacity, imaging parameters and quality of life, delays time-to-first-PAH-related morbidity and mortality, prevents worsening of World Health Organization…
To explore the efficacy and safety of an oral IP receptor agonist in an inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH population treated with standard of care.
Main objective:To assess the effects of selexipag on right ventricular (RV) function in participants with PAH.Secondary objectives:- To further assess the effects of selexipag on RV function using MRI.- To assess the effects of selexipag on disease…
To investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
To investigate the safety of a 6% HES solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in trauma patients.
The aim of the present study is to investigate whether selexipag could be helpful to treat patients with another form of PH called sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH).
The revised aims of the SORCE trial are:1. Does up to three years of treatment with sorafenib increase DFS compared with placebo: a comparison of Arm C vs Arm A2. If the answer to question (i) is yes, does one year of sorafenib (Arm B) increase DFS…