17 results
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
Primary Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS) of subjects with Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC of squamous histology who have been randomized to ipilimumab in addition to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus placebo in addition to paclitaxel and…
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant) and who have not yet received chemotherapy live longer (overall survival) when…
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
Primary objective: To determine safety, feasibility, and the immune-activating capacity of short-term combined neo-adjuvant and adjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab.Secondary objectives: To determine relapse free survival (RFS), any late adverse events,…
The objective of this study is to determine how well two different doses of ipilimumab work in patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant), and whom have the best radiographic progression-…
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
Are there differences is efficacy, side effects, tolerance en costs in patients with early RA in treatment with COBRA-light compared with COBRA according to BeSt?
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after receiving docetaxel treatment, when they are treated with bone directed radiotherapy plus Ipilimumab…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of RFA and Ipilimumab in patients with unresectable, pathologically confirmed hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
The primary objective of the study is the disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks of the combination treatment of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in patients with progressive MPM.The secondary objectives are:- to determine the safety profile of the…
The primary objective of the study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of REGN2810 (cemiplimab) plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as REGN2810/ipi) and REGN2810 plus 2 cycles only of platinum-based doublet…
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…