8 results
The primary endpoint (equal or improved MSQoL-54 and Eq5d) at which the value of telemonitoring is determined is t = 2 years.Mapping the effects of digital consultations or hospital visits, for MS patients, informal carers and the Isala…
The primary efficacy objectives for this study are as follows:* To evaluate the efficacy of etrolizumab (105 mg SC every 4 weeks [Q4W]) compared with placebo for the induction of remission as determined by the MCS at W14* To evaluate the efficacy of…
Primary:To evaluate the effects of singleinhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI)compared to multiple inhaler triplecombination therapy withbudesonide/formoterol plus tiotropiumafter 12 weeks of treatment on lungfunctionOther:To evaluate the effects of…
Induction Phase (IP)* To independently evaluate the efficacy of etrolizumab dose regimens compared with placebo in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at the end of the Induction Phase (Week 14)Maintenance Phase (MP)* To…
The primary efficacy objective for this study is as follows:* To evaluate the efficacy of etrolizumab (105 mg subcutaneous [SC] every 4 weeks [Q4W]) compared with infliximab in achieving both clinical response at Week (W) 10, and clinical remission…
The objectives of this open-label extension*safety monitoring (OLE-SM) study are as follows: Part 1 (Open-Label Extension; OLE) • To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of etrolizumab in patients eligible for Part 1 (OLE) Part 2 (Safety…
Primary objective:To compare the proportion of participants who make at least one critical error after reading the section on inhaler use in the patient information leaflets (PILs) for ELLIPTA and BREEZHALER inhalersSecondary Objectives:To compare…
The objectives of this open-label extension safety monitoring (OLE-SM) study are as follows:Part 1 (Open-Label Extension; OLE)• To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of etrolizumab in patients eligible for Part 1 (OLE)Part 2 (Safety Monitoring…