70 results
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of RFA and Ipilimumab in patients with unresectable, pathologically confirmed hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.
Primary objective: To determine safety, feasibility, and the immune-activating capacity of short-term combined neo-adjuvant and adjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab.Secondary objectives: To determine relapse free survival (RFS), any late adverse events,…
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
The objective of this study is to determine how well two different doses of ipilimumab work in patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant), and whom have the best radiographic progression-…
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after receiving docetaxel treatment, when they are treated with bone directed radiotherapy plus Ipilimumab…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant) and who have not yet received chemotherapy live longer (overall survival) when…
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
PrimaryCompare the efficacy (measured by objective response rate [ORR] and overall survival [OS]) of intratumoral IMO-2125 in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone.SecondaryAssess other measures of clinical benefit, safety,…
To evaluate the efficacy and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ELX/TEZ/IVA
Primary ObjectivesPart 1 (Monotherapy Dose Escalation Phase):* To determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SQZ AAC HPV monotherapy. * To characterize the safety and tolerability of SQZ AAC HPV administered as monotherapy. Part 2 (Combination…
Sub-study APhase 1b:To assess the DLT rate and estimate the MTD of sasanlimab in combination with encorafenib and binimetinib to determine the RP2D for the combination. Phase 2:To assess the durable ORR of sasanlimab in combination with encorafenib…
To evaluate the effect of elexacaftor (ELX)/tezacaftor (TEZ)/ivacaftor (IVA) on glucose tolerance in CF subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or CF related diabetes (CFRD)
The study objectives and endpoints described below will be evaluated for the following treatment regimens:• Arm A: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab maintenance• Arm B: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab maintenance• Arm C:…
Primary Objectives:• To compare Blinded Independent Committee for Radiology (BICR)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in participants of tissue Tumor Mutational Burden-High (tTMB-H) treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab • To compare…
The primary objective is to investigate the rate of pathological responses following different neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations in high-risk non-metastatic clear cell RCC in an adaptive trial design. And to study the safety and feasibility of…
To determine the real-world pharmacokinetics of ICIs.
In this study, we investigate whether induction with immunotherapy, followed by chemoradiation as consolidative therapy is an effective bladder-sparing therapy.