47 results
The objective of the study is to diminish the amount of chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin lymphoma who are likely to receive too much treatment with current treatment protocols.
Primary phase 1: To determine MTD and/or RP2D of INC280 incombination with erlotinibPrimary phase 2: To compare the antitumor activity of INC280 alone, and INC280 in combination with erlotinib, vs platinum with pemetrexed, as measured by Progression…
In this study we want to determine the erlotinib concentrations in blood after administration of erlotinib with water or whole milk with and without an antacid .
A pilot feasibility study (n=5) will be performed to evaluate the feasibility (logistics, timing) and safety of administering autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generated at the NKI-AVL infused in conjunction with systemic high-dose…
To select targeted treatment based on ex vivo kinase activity inhibition profiles to targeted agents of tumor tissue from patients with advanced cancer for whom no standard treatment is available.
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Primary:* To compare overall survival (OS) in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma ([STS], one of two subtypes: adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) when treated with eribulin (Arm A) or dacarbazine (Arm B).Secondary:* To compare…
The primary objective of this study is to compare the Overall Survival (OS) of first-linemaintenance therapy with erlotinib versus erlotinib administered at the time of diseaseprogression in patients with histologically documented, advanced or…
This randomized, open label phase III trial will be performed in patients with squamous carcinoma of the lung. The objectives of the trial are to compare the efficacy of afatinib with erlotinib as maintenance and second-line treatment for this group…
Primary Objective* To compare the objective response rate and overall survival of BMS-936558 to investigator*s choice in subjects with advanced melanoma.Secondary Objectives* To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 to…
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) of LY2875358 plus erlotinib therapy and LY2875358 monotherapy in patients with met proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) (MET) diagnostic positive (MET…
Primary: Explore the predictive ability of the VeriStrat signature, by testing for interaction between treatment arms (Arm A: erlotinib vs Arm B: docetaxel) and VeriStrat status (VSG vs VSP) using as outcome progression free survival. Secondary…
Primary objective: Efficacy of erlotinib plus bevacizumab subsequent to the combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab as determined by the maximum achieved disease control rate (DCR, complete response, partial response, or stable…
The purpose of this clinical trial is to test whether treatment of patients with NSCLC with erlotinib plus sunitinib is better than treatment with erlotinib plus placebo. All patients enrolling in this study will receive treatment with erlotinib.
see whether this treatment schedule is effective in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who have developed progression after treatment with EGFR-TKI monotherapy in standard dose before
The main objective of this pilot study is to determine intratumoral concentrations of kinase inhibitors upon 2 weeks of treatment in tumor tissue of patients.
Primary objective:* To compare the clinical efficacy of nilotinib to DTIC, based on progression free survival (PFS), in the treatment of c-Kit mutated melanoma in patients who have not received prior therapy with TKIs.Key secondary objectives:* To…
Primary objectives:To determine the objective tumor response (CR + PR) after 3 weeks of erlotinibSecondary objectives: To describe predictive markers for response:- radiological response (FDG-PET/CT)- EGFR mutations (HER1)To determine (diseasefree)…
Primary:•Efficacy of combination of erlotinib and sorafenib as determined by the rate of no progression at 6 weeks.•Determination of the impact of concomitant administration of sorafenib on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of erlotinibSecondary:•Efficacy…
primary objective of the trial is to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy of 4-6 cycles of BrECADD compared to 4-6 cycles of escalated BEACOPP, each followed by radiotherapy on PET-positive residual lesions, in terms of progression free survival (…