15 results
Primary Objective* To compare the objective response rate and overall survival of BMS-936558 to investigator*s choice in subjects with advanced melanoma.Secondary Objectives* To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 to…
The objective of the study is to diminish the amount of chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin lymphoma who are likely to receive too much treatment with current treatment protocols.
Primary objectiveTo compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.Secondary objectivesEfficacy- To compare the objective response of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.- To…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Primary objective:* To compare the clinical efficacy of nilotinib to DTIC, based on progression free survival (PFS), in the treatment of c-Kit mutated melanoma in patients who have not received prior therapy with TKIs.Key secondary objectives:* To…
Primary:* To compare overall survival (OS) in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma ([STS], one of two subtypes: adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) when treated with eribulin (Arm A) or dacarbazine (Arm B).Secondary:* To compare…
A pilot feasibility study (n=5) will be performed to evaluate the feasibility (logistics, timing) and safety of administering autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generated at the NKI-AVL infused in conjunction with systemic high-dose…
The primary objective:To compare LCZ696 to valsartan in reducing the rate of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death andtotal (first and recurrent) heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, in HF patients (NYHA Class II-IV) with preserved EF (LVEF…
Primary:- To elucidate the change in physical activity as assessed by the distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test between baseline and 12weeks of study drug treatment in sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril patients.- To assess changes…
The primary objective is to compare the OS in patients treated with IMCgp100 monotherapy versus Investigator*s Choice in HLA-A*0201 positive patients with advanced UM with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting. The secondary objectives of the…
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 compared to ramipril, in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and outpatient HF (time-to-first event analysis) in post-AMI…
The primary objectives of this study are:- To demonstrate that LCZ696 is superior to individualized medical therapy for comorbidities in reducing NT proBNP from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with HFpEF.- To demonstrate that LCZ696…
To determine whether treatment with MEK162 prolongs PFS as compared to dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated, advanced unresectable, or metastatic NRAS mutation-positive melanoma who are previously untreated or who have progressed on or…
The aim of this trial is to individualize and thus to optimize treatment for each patient by adapting it to the individual response. The treatment response is determined by means of FDG-PET after 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP + 2 cycles of ABVD.The…
To evaluate the effects of LCZ696 compared to valsartan on cognitive function over 3 years in patients with HFpEF as assessed by the CogState cognitive assessment battery.