17 results
Primary: to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens by assessing the average stable maximum best-corrected (BCVA) change from Month 4 to Month 12 compared to Month 3. A treatment regimen will be considered a relevant treatment option if…
Primary objectiveTo assess the efficacy of intravitreally (ITV) administered VEGF Trap-Eye compared to ranibizumab (in a non-inferiority paradigm) in preventing moderate vision loss in subjects with all subtypes of neovascular AMD Secondary…
Primary objective* To evaluate ocular and non-ocular adverse events during the 24-months study period in patients treated with Lucentis (0.5 mg)Secondary objectives* To describe the ocular and non-ocular adverse events over a cumulative 36-months…
Primary objectiveto demonstrate superiority of ranibizumab 0.5 mg as adjunctive or mono-therapy to laser treatment in the mean change from baseline in BCVA over a 12-month treatment period.Secondary objectives* to evaluate whether ranibizumab (0.5…
The primary objective of this study is to estimate the incidence of ocular adverse events in patients with CNV secondary to AMD who receive an individualized treatment with ranibizumab 0,3 mg.
Het objectives of the study are to demonstrate that combination therapy of Lucentis and Visudyne is not inferior in effectivity and safety to monotherapy with Lucentis and to investigate whether less Lucentis injections in combination therapy with…
Primary objective:* To compare the clinical efficacy of nilotinib to DTIC, based on progression free survival (PFS), in the treatment of c-Kit mutated melanoma in patients who have not received prior therapy with TKIs.Key secondary objectives:* To…
To compare visual outcome and foveal function after (initiation of) treatment between patients receiving an RPE-choroid graft and patients with anti-VEGF medication.
Primary:* To compare overall survival (OS) in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma ([STS], one of two subtypes: adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) when treated with eribulin (Arm A) or dacarbazine (Arm B).Secondary:* To compare…
A pilot feasibility study (n=5) will be performed to evaluate the feasibility (logistics, timing) and safety of administering autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generated at the NKI-AVL infused in conjunction with systemic high-dose…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of an individualized stabilization criteriadrivenPRN dosing regimen with 0.5 mg ranibizumab as assessed by the mean best-corrected visualacuity (BCVA) change at Month 12 compared to Baseline.
Primary Objective* To compare the objective response rate and overall survival of BMS-936558 to investigator*s choice in subjects with advanced melanoma.Secondary Objectives* To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 to…
Primary: To demonstrate that intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab administered based on individual patient needs has superior efficacy compared to sham treatment in adult patients with visual impairment due to VEGF-driven ME. Secondary: Best…
The main objective of the trial is to show that ABVD-based response-adapted therapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, with treatment intensification (BEACOPP) in case of a positive FDG-PET after one cycle of ABVD, has non-inferior efficacy…
Primary objectiveTo compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.Secondary objectivesEfficacy- To compare the objective response of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.- To…
The objective of the study is to diminish the amount of chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin lymphoma who are likely to receive too much treatment with current treatment protocols.