8 results
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using the Medtronic Specify® 5-6-5 multicolumn surgical lead plus optimal medical management (OMM) versus OMM alone in patients suffering from predominant low…
To test the non-inferiority of the Synergy* abluminal coated everolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Boston Scientific compared to the Nobori* abluminal coated biolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Terumo in the…
The main objective of the present study is to investigate whether the ORSIRO coronary stent is non-inferior compared to the Xience coronary stent in patients with total coronary occlusions.
The objective of the ABSORB PHYSIOLOGY is to evaluate the following in participants undergoing coronary artery scaffolding/stenting for significant coronary artery disease:• The acute (post-implantation) effect of an implanted BVS or mDES on…
The primary objective of this study is to compare pain suppression in two groups of subjects with chronic unilateral limb pain as a result of FBSS. Low Frequency spinal cord stimulation settings and High Frequency spinal cord stimulation settings…
This protocol will compare clinical outcomes of the SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE drug-eluting stents in a broad patient and lesion population and will gain substantial additional information on patients in a real world setting. These data will also provide…
To provide idelalisib, a marketed PI3K* inhibitor, in lieu of GS-9820, an investigational second generation PI3K* inhibitor, to subjects receiving GS-9820 in Study GS-US-315-0102 at the time of study closure.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effects of SCS on the number and intensity of VSA attacks. Secondary objective is to objectivate the effects of SCS on coronary spasms during the provocative acetylcholine test, and assess…