8 results
The evaluate which treatment of mallet fingers is better, the conventional mallet therapy via the hospital or the personalized treatment with intensive follow up via the handencentrum. This will be investigated for mallet fingers caused by an…
To assess whether there is a difference in the outcome in treatment of acute mallet fingers (exist <2 weeks) compared to chronic mallet fingers (exist > 4 weeks), using the same protocol of intensive follow-up by the '…
Primary Objective(s): To evaluate long-term safety in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA disease (MPS IIIA or Sanfilippo Type A) who received HGT-1410Secondary Objective(s):To evaluate:• The long-term cognitive function as measured by the…
Primary objective:To compare the effect of ixa+dex versus pom+dex on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide and…
Our first aim is to evaluate the validity of the developed arm leg ergometer prototype during an incremental exercise test by comparing the outcomes with a regular bicycle ergometer test. The second objective is to describe the movement of…
Primary objective:To compare the efficacy with belantamab mafodotin vs pomalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone (pom/dex) in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)Secondary objectives:- To compare the overall survival with…
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and tolerability of talquetamab when administered in different combination regimens and to identify the safe dose(s) of talquetamab combination regimens.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of teclistamab monotherapy (Arm A) with that of an investigator*s choice of PVd or Kd (Arm B: termed PVd/Kd hereafter) as assessed by PFS.