9 results
The main purpose of this research study is to find out if treatment of late relapse with liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) combined with carboplatin will control the tumor growth at least as well as standard treatment of paclitaxel and carboplatin.…
The primary objective of this study is to assess the objective response rate (ORR, the percentage of treated patients in whom the tumor significantly reduces in size or becomes non-detectable) of SAR240550 administered as a 60min intravenous…
To evaluate the anti-tumor activity of a docetaxel/carboplatin regimen in patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC. Furthermore to asses the safety profile of the docetaxel/carboplatin combination.In patients who have experienced FN, the efficacy…
To determine the MTD toxicity of standard dose cetuximab together with concurrent individualized, isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy and cisplatin-vinorelbine.
The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients receiving ASA404 or placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for first-line treatment of stage IIIb/IV NSCLC
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a combination of preoperative chemoradiation of Paclitaxel 50mg/m2 and Carboplatin AUC 2 given intravenously on day 1, 8,15, 22 and 29 in combination with 45 Gy (fractions of 1.8Gy) for locally…
The primary objective is to select one of two platinum strategies to be used in this regimen for use as experimental arm in Phase III. This is a screening feasibility study addressing purely investigational approaches.
Primary Objective:Part 1: To identify a dose of AMG 479 in combination with etoposide plus carboplatin and/or etoposide plus cisplatin, and of AMG 102 in combination with etoposide plus carboplatin and/or etoposide plus cisplatin that can be…
The final aim of the research project is to investigate the optimal time (*window*) for vaccination after chemotherapy.• To explore the optimal time-window to start immunotherapy after chemotherapy;• To study the time-related immune response to…