8 results
To determine the feasibility, toxicity and safety of anti-CEA x anti hapten bispecific antibodies (TF2) and Lu-177-labelled di-HSG-DOTA peptide (IMP-288) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Primary Objective* To compare the objective response rate and overall survival of BMS-936558 to investigator*s choice in subjects with advanced melanoma.Secondary Objectives* To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of BMS-936558 to…
Primary objective:* To compare the clinical efficacy of nilotinib to DTIC, based on progression free survival (PFS), in the treatment of c-Kit mutated melanoma in patients who have not received prior therapy with TKIs.Key secondary objectives:* To…
Primary:* To compare overall survival (OS) in subjects with advanced soft tissue sarcoma ([STS], one of two subtypes: adipocytic [ADI] or leiomyosarcoma [LMS]) when treated with eribulin (Arm A) or dacarbazine (Arm B).Secondary:* To compare…
A pilot feasibility study (n=5) will be performed to evaluate the feasibility (logistics, timing) and safety of administering autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) generated at the NKI-AVL infused in conjunction with systemic high-dose…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
The main objective of the trial is to show that ABVD-based response-adapted therapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, with treatment intensification (BEACOPP) in case of a positive FDG-PET after one cycle of ABVD, has non-inferior efficacy…
Primary objectiveTo compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.Secondary objectivesEfficacy- To compare the objective response of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine.- To…