32 results
Primary objectives-Determine efficacy, defined as PFS and OS at 2 years of risk-adaptive DA-EPOCH-R in newly diagnosed Burkitt lymphoma patients 18-75 years.-Determine feasibility, defined as > 60% of cycles of the DA-EPOCH-R scheme on an out…
To assess the feasibility and efficacy of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan consolidation treatment after R-PECC chemotherapy as second or third line treatment in patients with refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL, after or not eligible for…
To provide continued bevacizumab therapy as single agent or in combination with an anti-cancer drug to patients with cancer, who were previously enrolled in a F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche)/ Genentech sponsored bevacizumab study (i.e. the Parent, P-…
The primary objective of this second phase study is to estimate the occurrence of anastomotic leakage when the C-seal is used.Secondary objectives are:* Feasibility of applying the C-seal, especially considering the improved attachement to the…
Primary Objective:Part 1: To identify a dose of AMG 479 in combination with etoposide plus carboplatin and/or etoposide plus cisplatin, and of AMG 102 in combination with etoposide plus carboplatin and/or etoposide plus cisplatin that can be…
To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of nelarabine, etoposide and cyclophosphamide when given in combination to children with T-ALL and bone marrow relapse or T-LL.
Investigate the activity and safety of amrubicin alone versus amrubicin incombination with cisplatin versus standard treatment for extensive disease(ED) small-cell lung cancer in the first line setting.
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
The objective of the study is to diminish the amount of chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy for children with Hodgkin lymphoma who are likely to receive too much treatment with current treatment protocols.
The aim of the trial is to individualize treatment for each patient by adapting it to early response and thus to continue intensive treatment only with those patients wo show an inadequate treatment response.For patients who show a good initial…
The aim of this trial is to individualize and thus to optimize treatment for each patient by adapting it to the individual response. The treatment response is determined by means of FDG-PET after 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP + 2 cycles of ABVD.The…
Quizartinib selectively inhibits survival pathways that block apoptosis by inhibiting FLT3. Quizartinib inhibits proliferation of FLT3-dependent cell lines, and is effective in human leukemia tumor xenograft models of AML. Data from the Phase 1 and…
The objectives of the Phase 1 dose escalation are:Primary Objectives:* To establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and to establish the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPTD) for veliparib in combination withcarboplatin and etoposide.* To evaluate the…
The primary objective of this study is to compare, in a randomized phase III trial, the effect of 10-day decitabine at a dose of 20 mg/m2 versus conventional induction chemotherapy (*3+7*) on OS in older AML patients.
1. The primary objective of this phase I/II clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and toxicity of ACT plus nivolumab according to CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Toxicity grade 3 or less and SAE related to treatment but that does not result in treatment…
Primary: • To investigate whether adjuvant atezolizumab treatment after standard, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy improves overall survival (OS) compared with no treatment after standard, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in limited disease SCLC patients.…
Primary Objectives- Determine the MTD of pixantrone, rituximab (only in CD20 positive tumors), etoposide, and bendamustine in *fit' patients with rel aNHL of B- or T-cell phenotype.- Evaluate the ORR and PFS using the combination of pixantrone…
Primary ObjectiveTo evaluate whether lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide (Arm A) is superior to ifosfamide and etoposide (Arm B) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) by independent imaging review [IIR] using Response…
Primary objectivesTo compare overall survival for MK-7684A in combination with the background therapy of etoposide/platinum followed by MK-7684A to atezolizumab in combination with the background therapy of etoposide/platinum followed by…
To investigate the influence of aprepitant on the exposure to etoposide in TC patients treated with (B)EP.