31 results
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
The objective of this study is to determine how well two different doses of ipilimumab work in patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant), and whom have the best radiographic progression-…
Our primary objective is to compare the short term (3 months follow-up) clinical and radiographic results of the Bledsoe Thruster Brace with the SofTec OA Brace in the management of patients with medial knee OA and a varus leg alignment.
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after receiving docetaxel treatment, when they are treated with bone directed radiotherapy plus Ipilimumab…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant) and who have not yet received chemotherapy live longer (overall survival) when…
The objective of this study is to find the Median Local Anaesthetic Dose (MLAD/ED50) of Bupivacaine that allow direct postoperative mobilization and will accommodate sufficient anaesthesia during surgery.Results of this study might lead to…
The objective of this study is to find the median local anesthetic dose (MLAD/ED50) of bupivacaine that allow direct post-operative mobilization and will accommodate sufficient anesthesia during surgery.Results from this study might lead to the…
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
PrimaryCompare the efficacy (measured by objective response rate [ORR] and overall survival [OS]) of intratumoral IMO-2125 in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone.SecondaryAssess other measures of clinical benefit, safety,…
Primary Objectives:• To compare Blinded Independent Committee for Radiology (BICR)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in participants of tissue Tumor Mutational Burden-High (tTMB-H) treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab • To compare…
The primary objectives of the study are:For Parts A through C:1. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of CX-072, administered as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab or vemurafenib to patients with metastatic or locally…
To establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered as a flat dose in combination with weight-based ipilimumab dosing.
Primary ObjectivePart A: To compare disease-free survival (DFS) per Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus placebo infusions in participants with localized RCC, with a predominantly clear cell…
Primary Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS) of subjects with Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC of squamous histology who have been randomized to ipilimumab in addition to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus placebo in addition to paclitaxel and…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…