31 results
In patients with neoadjuvant disease the purpose of the study is to define the safety and tolerability of the drug. In patients with metastatic disease the purpose is to determine if treatment with Nivolumab or Nivolumab and ipilimumab will lead to…
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…
Primary Objectives:• To compare progression free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin regimen as first…
To establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered as a flat dose in combination with weight-based ipilimumab dosing.
The aim of the study is to compare the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and assess Duration of Response (DoR) of the treatment of nivolumab in combination with ipilumumab vs. nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab placebo, as determined by a blinded…
The primary objectives of the study are:For Parts A through C:1. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of CX-072, administered as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab or vemurafenib to patients with metastatic or locally…
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant) and who have not yet received chemotherapy live longer (overall survival) when…
Primary Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS) of subjects with Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC of squamous histology who have been randomized to ipilimumab in addition to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus placebo in addition to paclitaxel and…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
The objective of this study is twofold. First, we want to investigate the effectiveness of a COBRA-plus therapy after incomplete response on COBRA-light therapy after 13 weeks to improve the percentage of RA-patients with a high disease activity and…
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
The primary objective of the study is the disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks of the combination treatment of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in patients with progressive MPM.The secondary objectives are:- to determine the safety profile of the…
The objective of this study is to determine how well two different doses of ipilimumab work in patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant), and whom have the best radiographic progression-…
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after receiving docetaxel treatment, when they are treated with bone directed radiotherapy plus Ipilimumab…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
Part A:* To obtain evidence of antitumor effect of CX-072 in combination with ipilimumab in subjects withsolid tumors based on the objective response rate (ORR) as defined by the Response EvaluationCriteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1Part B:* To…