6 results
Objectives:Primary Objectives:1. To evaluate the efficacy of BAN2401 compared to placebo by establishing the ED90 (as defined in theprotocol) for BAN2401 on the derived Composite Clinical Score at 12 months of treatment in subjects withEarly…
To test the non-inferiority of the Synergy* abluminal coated everolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Boston Scientific compared to the Nobori* abluminal coated biolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Terumo in the…
The objective of the ABSORB PHYSIOLOGY is to evaluate the following in participants undergoing coronary artery scaffolding/stenting for significant coronary artery disease:• The acute (post-implantation) effect of an implanted BVS or mDES on…
The main objective of the present study is to investigate whether the ORSIRO coronary stent is non-inferior compared to the Xience coronary stent in patients with total coronary occlusions.
The primary objective is: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NIM811 administered in combination with SOC in an interferon-relapser population of patients infected with chronic hepatitis C genotype-1.Secundary objectives are: * To…
This protocol will compare clinical outcomes of the SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE drug-eluting stents in a broad patient and lesion population and will gain substantial additional information on patients in a real world setting. These data will also provide…