10 results
To investigate efficacy of neoadjuvant axitinib and avelumab in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma with moderate to high risk of recurrence .
Primary ObjectiveTo demonstrate that avelumab in combination with axitinib is superior to sunitinib monotherapy in prolonging PFS or OS in the first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive patients with aRCC.Secondary Objectives* To demonstrate that…
To demonstrate the benefit of sequential chemo-immunotherapy in increasing the proportion of patients reaching a pathological complete response (pCR) at radical surgery in patients with locally advanced irresectable, stage cT4bNxM0, or clinically…
This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in PMS patients.
Main objective:English To evaluate the longer-term safety of ocrelizumab in participants diagnosed with MS who were previously enrolled in Roche-sponsored\ Phase III pivotal studiesSecondary objectives:English To evaluate the longer-term efficacy of…
The objective of this prospective, randomized study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of HSCT compared to the comparator group (alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab) in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting MS. In Norway, the…
To demonstrate benefit of maintenance treatment with avelumab for a maximum of six months avelumab in increasing overall survival (OS) at 18 months in the whole study population of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC who…
The evaluation of R-IrAE's after ICI therapy, specifically incidence, treament of R-IrAE's, response to said treatment, baseline and follow-up serology (general and symptom specific) to be combined with quality of life assessment and…
This Extension study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in MS patients who were previously enrolled in a Roche sponsored ocrelizumab phase IIIb/IV parent trial.
With this study we aim to prove that personalized B cell tailored ocrelizumab treatment is non-inferior in the suppression of MS disease activity (clinically and radiologically) compared to the standard (fixed 24 week interval) treatment.