17 results
* To evaluate the effectiveness of contemporary PCI treatment of de novo 3-vessel disease following the heart team selection applying the SYNTAX Score II with pressure wire functional assessment and IVUS guidance (SYNTAX II strategy).* To establish…
The primary objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of multiple doses of ABT-494 versus placebo in moderately to severely active RA subjects on stable background MTX therapy with inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF biologic…
ObjectiveTo investigate the performance of paclitaxel-coated balloon expandable stainless steel coronary stent for the treatment of infrapopliteal stenoses and occlusions in patients with critical limb ischemia compared to percutaneous transluminal…
To demonstrate non-inferiority in terms of neointimal coverage of Cre8 (CID) Drug Eluting Stent, evaluated at three months afterstent implantation, compared to Vision/Multilink 8 (Abbott) Bare Metal Stent evaluated at one month, in terms of…
The primairy objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus OPTIMA stent in the treatment of the novo lesions in native cotronary arteries with a maximum lenght of 28 mm and a diameter of 2.5 - 4.0 mm
Tiotropium is available in the pharmacy as solution for inhalation (daily dose of 5 mcg) and as inhalation powder (daily dose of 18 mcg). The objective of the present study is to compare three doses of tiotropum solution for inhalation (daily dose…
To establish superiority of the biolimus-eluting (BiomatrixTM) stent compared with an otherwise identical bare-metal stent (GazelleTM) in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in terms of the composite endpoint of cardiac death,…
To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ABT-494 in RA subjects who have completed Study M13-550 or Study M13-537 Phase 2 RCT with ABT-494.
Period 1: The first objective, of period 1, is to compare the safety and efficacy of ABT-494 15 mg QD monotherapy, and 30 mg QD monotherapy versus weekly methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis…
Period 1: The first objective, of period 1, is to compare the safety and efficacy of ABT-494 30 mg (QD) and 15 mg QD versus placebo on a background of csDMARD(s) for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in bDMARD-…
Period 1: The first objective, of period 1, is to compare the efficacy of ABT-494 15 mg QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in subjects with moderately to severely active RA who are…
Period 1:The first objective, of period 1, is to compare the efficacy of ABT-494 15 mg QD and 30 mg QD versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of subjects with active RA who are on a stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-…
The objectives of this study are to determine the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of ABT-494 versus placebo and to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ABT-494 following oral administration in subjects with moderately to severely active Crohn…
The primary objective is to establish the non-inferiority of the Synergy stent relative to the Xience stent for prevention of MACE. The effect measure is the difference in the rate of MACE in patients randomized to treatment with the Synergy ( index…
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that includes two periods. Period 1 is designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib low dose once daily (QD) and high dose QD versus placebo in participants with moderately to…
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that includes two periods. Period 1 is designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of upadacitinib low dose once daily (QD) and high dose B QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab every other week (…
Main objectives:1. To evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib compared with placebo on reduction of signs and symptoms as measured by proportion of subjects who achieve an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 40 response at…