20 results
1. To assess the effect of the switch from protease inhibitors to raltegravir on endothelial function. 2. To assess the effect of the intervention mentioned above on markers of endothelial function; immune activation; chronic inflammation; and, on…
Primary objective:To assess the effect of multiple dose atorvastatin on the steady state pharmacokinetics of raltegravir and vice versa by intrasubject comparison in healthy subjects.• The comparison of steady state raltegravir (400 mg BID for 7…
Primary objective* To assess the non-inferiority of darunavir/r + raltegravir compared to darunavir/r + tenofovir/emtricitabine as first-line treatment strategies in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral naïve adults over at least 96 weeks (i.e. to assess…
Primary objectiveTo determine the effect of steady state boceprevir on the pharmacokinetics (AUC0-12h, Cmax, C12h) of a single dose raltegravir.Secondary objectives:To determine the effect of a single dose raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics (AUC0-…
To assess non-inferiority of a regimen containing ritonavir-boosted elvitegravir versusraltegravir, each administered with a background regimen in HIV-1 infected,antiretroviral treatment-experienced adult subjects as determined by the proportion…
To determine the effect of chronic use of ginkgo biloba on the single-dose pharma-cokinetics (AUC0-inf, AUC0-12, Cmax, C12) of raltegravir 400mg in healthy volunteers.
In vitro data indicate that raltegravir is not a substrate of UGT1A4 or UGT2B7, but there is no evidence that raltegravir itself does not influence metabolism of other agents mediated by either UGT1A4 or UGT2B7.
Primary: Antiviral efficacy after 48 weeks of treatment. Secundary: Antiviral efficacy after 24 weeks, safety and tolerability, resistance development, PK, incidence of HIV-associated conditions, gender-, race-, and/or HIV-1 subtype on response to…
Primary: To compare the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir 400 mg twice daily vs. ralte-gravir 800 mg once daily (QD) by intrasubject comparison. Secondary: To determine the efficacy of an antiretroviral regimen consisting of raltegravir 800mg QD,…
Primary Objectives:*To explore whether early abiraterone exposure (AUC) is corre*lated to treatment response after 3 months and 6 months of therapy (primarily based on radiographic response (RECIST re*sponse: SD, PR, CR) and secondary on…
Primary objective: To determine the efficacy of the combination of olaparib and abiraterone vs placebo and abiraterone by assessment of rPFS (Radiographic progression-free survival) in patients with mCRPC (Metastatic castration-resistant prostate…
To determine the efficacy (as assessed by rPFS) and safety of olaparib versus investigator choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have failed prior treatment with a new hormonal…
Primary: • Demonstrate superior efficacy (increased progression-free survival [PFS]) of MEK162 vs. physician*s choice of selected chemotherapies (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel and topotecan)Key Secondary: • Demonstrate superior efficacy (…
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of placement of the esophageal HILZO Covered stent with the TTS method in patients with non-operable malignant obstruction of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction,…
Primary objective:To determine the equivalent dose of abiraterone when taken with a continental breakfast compared to 1000 mg in fasted stateSecondary objective:To evaluate the preference of the patients: intake of abiraterone with or without food
The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of 177Lu-PNT2002, an investigational agent being studied for patients with mCRPC who have experienced disease progression following treatment with abiraterone,…
The purpose of this study is to understand if a new treatment for prostate cancer (niraparib) added to a standard treatment (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone) will work better than the standard treatment alone.Cohort 3: the purpose is to evaluate…
- To compare the effect of capivasertib + abiraterone relative to placebo + abiraterone by assessment of radiographic progression-free survival PFS) in patients with PTEN-deficient mHSPC.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether 177Lu-PSMA-617, given for 6 cycles at a dose of 7.4 Gigabecquerel (GBq) (200 Millicuries (mCi)) +/- 10%, improves the radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) or death compared to a change in…
Primary: * To assess Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) in patients with mCRPC and poor prognostic factors treated with cabazitaxel or novel hormonal agents (abiraterone OR enzalutamide) as second-line therapy.Secondary: * To formally compare CBR in both…