15 results
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mesalazine granules (3 g 5*ASA/d) vs. placebo for the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis. Additionally, the safety and tolerability in the form of adverse events and…
Until recently there were only few therapeutic options to treat AS. Efficacy is proven for several tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents, including golimumab. 2-8 However, up to now, the efficacy of golimumab treatment on EAMs, like anterior…
The primary study objectives are as follows:-To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of golimumab in pediatric subjects aged 2 through 17 years with moderately to severely active UC.-To evaluate the safety of golimumab in pediatric subjects aged 2…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
1) to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of golimumab + MTX versus MTX alone in DMARD naïve PsA patients2) to demonstrate that golimumab + MTX is superior to MTX alone to achieve low to very low disease activity in DMARD naïve PsA patients3) to…
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
The primary objective of the study is the disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks of the combination treatment of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in patients with progressive MPM.The secondary objectives are:- to determine the safety profile of the…
The aim of the study is to compare the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and assess Duration of Response (DoR) of the treatment of nivolumab in combination with ipilumumab vs. nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab placebo, as determined by a blinded…
The primary objectives of the study are:For Parts A through C:1. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of CX-072, administered as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab or vemurafenib to patients with metastatic or locally…
To investigate whether tapering MTX first, then the TNFi golimumab (GOL), is more efficacious than tapering GOL first, then MTX, in sustaining remission and reaching drug free remission.
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…
Primary Objectives:• To compare progression free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin regimen as first…