67 results
Primary objective: To determine safety, feasibility, and the immune-activating capacity of short-term combined neo-adjuvant and adjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab.Secondary objectives: To determine relapse free survival (RFS), any late adverse events,…
Scar volume and POSAS score will be measured in the Verapamil group, these will be compared to the scar volume and POSAS score in the Kenacort+Verapamil group and the Kenacort group. In addition, complications/ adverse effects will be reported.
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of RFA and Ipilimumab in patients with unresectable, pathologically confirmed hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.
The objective of this study is to investigate the added effect of an intramuscular (IM) gluteal corticosteroid injection above a placebo IM gluteal injection (saline) on pain symptoms in patients with hip OA, not responding satisfactory to the usual…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
In this randomized controlled phase III study we will evaluate whether TIL infusion preceded by non-myeloablative chemotherapy and followed by high dose bolus interleukin-2 can result in an improved progression free survival when randomly compared…
Primary Objectives:• To compare Blinded Independent Committee for Radiology (BICR)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in participants of tissue Tumor Mutational Burden-High (tTMB-H) treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab • To compare…
Primary objective:- To compare efficacy of induction vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) versus upfront ipilimumab + nivolumab treatment (Arm B).Secondary Objectives- To describe duration of response and overall…
Primary ObjectivesPart 1 (Monotherapy Dose Escalation Phase):* To determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of SQZ AAC HPV monotherapy. * To characterize the safety and tolerability of SQZ AAC HPV administered as monotherapy. Part 2 (Combination…
PrimaryCompare the efficacy (measured by objective response rate [ORR] and overall survival [OS]) of intratumoral IMO-2125 in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone.SecondaryAssess other measures of clinical benefit, safety,…
The main objectives of the trial are to:• evaluate the safety of venetoclax monotherapy.• determine dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and the recommended Phase 2 dose (RPTD) of venetoclax monotherapy.• assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of venetoclax…
To assess the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with AZA compared to placebo with AZA in treatment-naive higher-risk MDS.
Primary objective • To compare the event-free survival (EFS) of neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab (followed by adjuvant nivolumab or dabrafenib + trametinib in patients not achieving a pathologic response) versus standard adjuvant nivolumab.
We will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the two guideline recommended treatments for patients with persisting shoulder pain over a 12 month time period. Patients will be randomized to a local corticosteroid injection or referral for…
The study objectives and endpoints described below will be evaluated for the following treatment regimens:• Arm A: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab maintenance• Arm B: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab maintenance• Arm C:…
Primary objective: To determine the efficacy of the combination of acalabrutinib and venetoclax without obinutuzumab (AV; Arm A), or with obinutuzumab (AVG; Arm B) compared with chemoimmunotherapy (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab [FCR]/…
Primary objective• To evaluate efficacy of acalabrutinib/venetoclax (AV) in terms of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) response in bone marrow (BM) after 26 cycles of treatment in patients with CLL previously treated with venetoclax and…
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of continuous ibrutinib monotherapy with fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab and fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax by measuring progression-free survival (PFS) in patients…