18 results
Primary objective: To demonstrate that QVA149 (110/50 *g o.d.) is at least non-inferior to salmeterol/fluticasone (50/500 *g b.i.d.) in terms of rate of COPD exacerbations.Secondary objectives: Superiority in terms of exacerbation rate. Time to…
Section 7 of the protocol:7. TRIAL OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE* To assess the long term bronchodilator efficacy of Aclidinium bromide/Formoterol fumarate, administered twice a day, compared to Salmeterol/Fluticasone propionate (SeretideTM AccuhalerTM) in…
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the addition of a LABA to an ICS (FSC) therapy is non-inferior in terms of risk of serious asthma-related events (asthma-related hospitalizations, endotracheal intubations, and deaths) compared with ICS…
The objective of this study is to obtain information regarding the effectiveness and safety of a product called Foster® for the treatment of asthma. This product is a combination between two well known drugs: formoterol fumarate and beclomethasone…
Compare if once daily laba/lama treatment with two different dosages shows the same or better result on the 24 hr lungfunction than twice daily treatment of two different dosages with ICS/laba treatment. .
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether the addition of LABA to ICS therapy (FSC) is non-inferior to ICS therapy alone (FP) in terms of the risk of serious asthma related events (asthma-related hospitalization, endotracheal…
Efficacy and safety.
Primary: To demonstrate non-inferiority of RELVAR 100/25 once-daily to SERETIDE 250/50 twice-daily in adult and adolescent subjects 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma,adequately controlled on twice-daily ICS/LABA. Secondary: Adverse…
This research proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of the SMART approach with budesonide/fomoterol versus fixed dose treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol in patients with COPD.
Primary: To evaluate the efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI to reduce the annual rate of moderate and severe exacerbations compared with dual therapy of FF/VI or UMEC/VI in subjects with COPD. Secondary: Long term safety and other efficacy parameters.
Primary ObjectiveTo evaluate the antitumor activity of tucatinib given in combination with trastuzumab in subjects with previously treated, locally-advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing/…
Primary* Compare progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria inSolid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 between treatment armsKey Secondary* Compare overall survival (OS) between treatment arms* Compare PFS by…
To demonstrate superiority in peak bronchodilator effect of QVM149 at a dose of 150/50/160 *g o.d. and 150/50/80 *g o.d. compared to a FDC ofsalmeterol/fluticasone at a dose of 50/500 *g b.i.d. after 3 weeks of treatment in patients with asthma.
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of QVM149 (QVM149 150/50/80 *g and QVM149 150/50/160 *g via Concept1) over two respective QMF149 doses (QMF149 150/160 *g and QMF149 150/320 *g via Concept1 in…
To evaluate safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free regimen with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and tucatinib in stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 in comparison to mFOLFOX6 given with or without either bevacizumab or cetuximab as first-line (1L) treatment in adults with HER2 positive (HER2+)…
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and mFOLFOX6 in comparison to mFOLFOX6 given with or without either bevacizumab or cetuximab as first-line (1L) treatment in adults with HER2 positive (HER2+)…
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab as maintenance therapy in subjects with advanced HER2+ breast cancer who have had prior treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab.