24 results
Herewith, we present a research protocol that allows us to examine feasibility and safety of checkpoint blockade neoadjuvant to standard of care (SOC) in a patient population in need for improved clinical outcome and in tumors likely to respond to…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
PrimaryCompare the efficacy (measured by objective response rate [ORR] and overall survival [OS]) of intratumoral IMO-2125 in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone.SecondaryAssess other measures of clinical benefit, safety,…
Primary Objectives:• To compare Blinded Independent Committee for Radiology (BICR)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in participants of tissue Tumor Mutational Burden-High (tTMB-H) treated with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab • To compare…
The primary objectives of the study are:For Parts A through C:1. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of CX-072, administered as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab or vemurafenib to patients with metastatic or locally…
To establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered as a flat dose in combination with weight-based ipilimumab dosing.
Primary ObjectivePart A: To compare disease-free survival (DFS) per Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus placebo infusions in participants with localized RCC, with a predominantly clear cell…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…
In patients with neoadjuvant disease the purpose of the study is to define the safety and tolerability of the drug. In patients with metastatic disease the purpose is to determine if treatment with Nivolumab or Nivolumab and ipilimumab will lead to…
The primary objective of the study is the disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks of the combination treatment of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in patients with progressive MPM.The secondary objectives are:- to determine the safety profile of the…
The purpose of the study is to compare these two drugs in view of how quickly and to what extent the drugs are absorbed and eliminated from the body (this is called pharmacokinetics) after injection under the skin of the abdomen.In addition, it will…
Primary Objectives:• To compare progression free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin regimen as first…
The aim of the study is to compare the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and assess Duration of Response (DoR) of the treatment of nivolumab in combination with ipilumumab vs. nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab placebo, as determined by a blinded…
Primary objective:- To compare efficacy of induction vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) versus upfront ipilimumab + nivolumab treatment (Arm B).Secondary Objectives- To describe duration of response and overall…
The primary objective is to compare the OS in patients treated with IMCgp100 monotherapy versus Investigator*s Choice in HLA-A*0201 positive patients with advanced UM with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting. The secondary objectives of the…
Part A:* To obtain evidence of antitumor effect of CX-072 in combination with ipilimumab in subjects withsolid tumors based on the objective response rate (ORR) as defined by the Response EvaluationCriteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1Part B:* To…
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of brigatinib to that of crizotinib in ALK+ locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients naive to ALK inhibitors, as evidenced by PFS.The secondary objectives of the study are:1. To…