7 results
Main objective:To evaluate the non-inferiority of switching to the FTC/RPV/TAF FDC as compared to continuing FTC/RPV/TDF FDC in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected subjects as determined by maintaining HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 48…
To establish the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose of the coadministration of LDE225 and INC424 in patients with MF, who have not previously received therapy with a JAK inhibitor
Primary: To estimate the MTD and/or RDE for each of the following three treatment arms in patients with myelofibrosis.* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* Ribociclib (LEE011) plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib and Ribociclib (LEE011…
1. To improve the overall outcome as compared to the previous protocols of the DCOG, especially ALL-9 and ALL-10.This is aimed for by decreasing therapy for part of the patients (TEL/AML1, Down syndrome, PPR only), increasing therapy for IKZF1…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with grade II-IV steroid refractory- acute graft vs host disease assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Day 28.Secondary:…
To assess the rate of complete response (CR) in Grades III and IV SR-aGVHD participants on Day 28 postrandomization.
To characterize the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of each combination partner used with ruxolitinib (Part 1)To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of each novel ruxolitinib combination treatment arm (Parts 2 & 3)