7 results
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of plitidepsin in combination with dexamethasone vs. dexamethasone alone as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Secondary objectives…
For the Einstein-DVT evaluation. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate whether rivaroxaban is at least as effective as enoxaparin/VKA in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) without symptomatic…
Primary Objective During Double-Blind Period:To compare the efficacy of BMS-945429 SC versus placebo on a background of methotrexate as assessed by ACR20 response rates at 12 weeks.Secondary Objectives During Double-Blind Period:1) To assess…
Objectives1.3.1 Primary ObjectiveCompare the efficacy of BMS-945429 versus placebo for induction of clinical remission (defined by an absolute Crohn*s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score < 150) at Week 8 (IP-57).1.3.2 Secondary Objectives•…
Primary Objective** To compare the PFS of melflufen plus dexamethasone (Arm A) versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Arm B) as assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) according to the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response…
The study will look at patients with relapsed (returned after prior treatment) and refractory (not responsive to prior treatment) multiple myeloma. The research aims to compare a new drug called elotuzamab combined with standard of care (…
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the impact of a strategy aimed at switching INR-guided VKA management to a NOAC-based treatment strategy is superior in terms of the occurrence of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding…