9 results
Primary: To assess the efficacy of treatment with 300 mg or 600 mg of intravenous (IV) zanamivir twice daily compared to 75 mg of oral oseltamivir twice daily on time to clinical response. Secondary: reduction in viral load from nasopharyngeal swabs…
If proven (cost)effective, without inducing antivral resistance, oseltamivir could have considerable benefits in this setting, although constraints relating to implementation need to be addressed as well. If not (cost)effective if this fragile…
Primary: To assess the antiviral efficacy of triple combination antiviral drug (TCAD) therapy(i.e. amantadine and ribavirin co-administered with oseltamivir) compared to oseltamivirmonotherapy in immunocompromised subjects diagnosed with Influenza…
Primary: To determine the safety and tolerability of TCAD administered orally to immunocompromised patients diagnosed with influenza ASecondary: To assess the antiviral effect, the speed of symptom resolution, and the influenza complication rate of…
Primary:To assess the efficacy of treatment with IV danirixin twice daily given with oral oseltamivir compared to oral oseltamivir twice daily on time to clinical response (TTCR)Secondary:Time to respiratory response (TTRR), clinical measures of…
The primary objective is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of JNJ-63623872 in combination with oseltamivir in elderly subjects (aged 65 to *85 years) compared to adults (aged 18 to *64 years) with influenza A infection.
The trial will compare two doses of BI 685509 (2 mg and 3 mg BID) with placebo, on top of standard of care, in patients with CSPH in compensated alcohol-related cirrhosis. The primary objective is to estimate the mean difference between treatment…
The trial will investigate the safety and tolerability of BI 685509 in patients with CSPH in compensated cirrhosis due to HBV, HCV and NASH with or without T2DM and the combination of BI 685509 and empagliflozin in patients with CSPH in compensated…
The main objectives of the trial are to demonstrate the effectiveness of BI 685509 and to characterize the dose-response relationship for BI 685509 in patients with DKD by assessing 3 doses and placebo.