4 results
Primary: To evaluate the efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI to reduce the annual rate of moderate and severe exacerbations compared with dual therapy of FF/VI or UMEC/VI in subjects with COPD. Secondary: Long term safety and other efficacy parameters.
Is priming of the cervix, as part of induction of labour:* At home cost-effective and safe compared to the hospital?* with oral misoprostol cost-effective and safe compared to a Foley catheter?
Primary:To compare the effect of UMEC/VI (62.5/25 mcg once daily) with UMEC (62.5 mcg once daily) on lung functionSecondary:To compare UMEC/VI, UMEC with salmeterol (50 mcg twice daily) on patient reported outcomes and on other COPD efficacy…
Primary Objective phase 2 part of the study- To determine the confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of repotrectinib in each subject population expansion cohort of advanced solid tumors that…