12 results
Primary ObjectiveThe primary objective for this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of weekly abatacept in combination with methotrexate to methotrexate alone in achieving Remission, defined as SDAI less than or equal to 3, at Week 24.…
The primary objective for this study is to demonstrate that SC injections of abatacept are non-inferior to IV infusions of abatacept .
Main objective:To assess the relapse rate (defined by clinical and biochemical parameters) over 24 months in patients with acute AAV presenting at first diagnosis of relapse, after 12 months of treatment with abatacept in combination with steroids…
Primary ObjectivesPlacebo-Controlled Induction Period: Primary Objective: Compare the proportion of subjects who have a clinical response (as defined by a reduction in Crohn*s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] >= 100 or an absolute CDAI score…
Placebo-Controlled Induction Period Primary Objective: Compare the proportion of subjects who have a clinical response at Week 12 between the abatacept and placebo treatment regimens.Maintenance Period Primary Objective: Compare the proportion of…
Primary: to assess efficacy of weekly subcutaneous (SC) administration of Abatacept vs. placebo on disease activity assessed with ESSDAI at in patients with pSS. Secondary: to assess efficacy of Abatacept on clinical, functional, subjective, and…
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and acceptability of abatacept therapy in subjects at high risk of developing RA.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether a switching strategy using adalimumab concentration (TDM) is superior to usual care in rheumatoid arthritis patients failing adalimumab treatment with regard to response rates. The secondary objectives…
Primary Efficacy Objective (Blinded Treatment Period)• To demonstrate the efficacy of rilzabrutinib versus placebo in participants with refractory/relapsed ITP, based on the durability of platelet response during the last12 weeks of the 24-week…
The purpose of the study is to evaluate how effective rilzabrutinib is and how safe it is, in reducing the signs and symptoms in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who continue to have symptoms despite the use of H1-antihistamines (…
Main objective:1. To compare the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) versus abatacept intravenous (IV) for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in bDMARD-inadequate response (bDMARD-IR) or bDMARD-…
The sponsor is developing a biological product (DRL_AB) similar to the approved medicine Orencia®. As part of medical-scientific studies to confirm the similarity of the biological products, the Sponsor wants to compare DRL_AB with EU-approved…