9 results
Earlier research nas shown the emerging efficacy and safety profile for INC424, which supports further studies in PV subjects who demonstrate resistance or intolerance to HU therapy [Barosi et al.2009]. This pivotal phase III trial (CINC424B2301) is…
Discrimination of probable AD patients from healthy volunteers by ZK 6032924 PET imaging as evaluated by visual analysis of the brain distribution patterns and by SUV values in probable AD patients as compared to healthy volunteers for brain imaging…
To establish the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose of the coadministration of LDE225 and INC424 in patients with MF, who have not previously received therapy with a JAK inhibitor
Primary: To estimate the MTD and/or RDE for each of the following three treatment arms in patients with myelofibrosis.* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* Ribociclib (LEE011) plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib and Ribociclib (LEE011…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with moderate or severe SR-cGvHD assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Cycle 7 Day 1 visit.Secondary: To compare the rate…
To assess the rate of complete response (CR) in Grades III and IV SR-aGVHD participants on Day 28 postrandomization.
The purpose of the study intends to assess safety, activity and pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib treatment with corticosteroids in treatment-naïve and steroid refractory (SR)- acute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) patients aged *28 days to <…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with grade II-IV steroid refractory- acute graft vs host disease assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Day 28.Secondary:…
To characterize the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of each combination partner used with ruxolitinib (Part 1)To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of each novel ruxolitinib combination treatment arm (Parts 2 & 3)