47 results
To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination wth 131I-MIBG in pediatric patients with relapsed or progressive neuroblastoma.
To improve overall survival of patients with a early-stage high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma.
The primary objective of this study is to estimate the best objective response rates (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) associated with gemcitabine-cisplatin plus necitumumab in chemotherapy-naïve patients with Stage IV squamous…
Primary:* To determine if alisertib improves overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) versus a selection of single agents in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL)* To determine…
The purpose of this study is to find out if the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin and iniparib works better than gemcitabine and carboplatin alone in subjects with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that have not…
Objectives:Primary:- To evaluate efficacy as measured by overall survival (OS), with a goal of demonstrating the superiority of inotuzumab ozogamicin when administered in combination with rituximab, compared with an active comparator arm.Secondary…
Run-in phase I: To confirm the safety and tolerability of BIBF 1120 up to a dose level of 200 mg b.i.d added to a standard dose of cisplatin/gemcitabine in first line NSCLC patients with squamous cell histology. Pharmacokinetics of BIBF 1120 and…
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a personalized drug profiling method using short-term cultures of malignant cells derived from the patient*s pleural fluid.
The primary objective of the Phase 2 part of the study is to determine if overall survival(OS) in patients with Stage II-IV unresectable pancreatic cancer administered LY2603618 and gemcitabine combination therapy exceeds gemcitabine monotherapy OS.…
Phase I part To determine the recommended safe dosing for the combination of chemoradiation with gemcitabine plus panitumumab in patients with inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.Phase II part 1) To investigate the proportion of patients…
To ascertain whether the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in a therapeutic dose can be predicted from the pharmacokinetics of a microdose.
Primary objective: To compare progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded, central review between patients randomized to niraparib versus physician*s choice. Key secondary objective: To compare overall survival between patients randomized…
The study will look at patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours express a certain type of protein called PD-L1. The research aims to compare a new drug called nivolumab against Investigator's choice of…
Phase A:Primary objective: Determining the feasibility of gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer in DIPG Secondary objective: Evaluation of efficacy in terms of clinical and radiological response rate and progression free survivalTertiary objectives:…
Objectives: 1. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and immune modulation of TIL plus IFN* in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and to determine the optimal dose of IFN* that can be given in combination with chemotherapy.2.…
Primary Objective• To compare the anti-tumor efficacy of oral single-agent rociletinib, as measured by investigator assessment of the progression-free survival (PFS), with that of single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with EGFR mutated,…
To determine the MTD toxicity of standard dose cetuximab together with concurrent individualized, isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy and cisplatin-vinorelbine.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the objective response rate (ORR, the percentage of treated patients in whom the tumor significantly reduces in size or becomes non-detectable) of SAR240550 administered as a 60min intravenous…
This study will evaluate several LEP characteristics before and during pain alleviation methods.Does pain treatment affect VAS scores, noted by the subject before and after a set of applied stimuli.
The primary aim of the study is to investigate whether it is possible to select patients by PET in a good prognosis group (i.e. low SUV) who will not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.