18 results
In this study, the main clinical hypothesis is that the TIMI clinically significant bleeding rates will not be different between the rivaroxaban and VKA treatment strategy groups at Month 12.
The primary efficacy objective of the study is:* to evaluate whether rivaroxaban added to ASA is superior to ASA alone in reducingthe risk of major thrombotic vascular events (defined as MI, ischemic stroke, CVdeath, ALI, and major amputation of a…
To estimate the bleeding risk with rivaroxaban, compared with ASA, in addition to a singleantiplatelet agent (clopidogrel or ticagrelor), in subjects with a recent ACS .
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the efficacy of rivaroxaban, a direct FXa inhibitor, is non-inferior to that of dose-adjusted warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in subjects with non-valvular atrial…
Objectives:To collect data on effect size for, and determine the feasibility of, a full scale multicentre RCT(Randomized Controlled Trial) that1. compares the efficacy and safety of NOACs with VKA treatment according to Dutchstandards, in VKA-…
The purpose of this study is to show that the incidence of new thrombotic events during an additional 6 or 12 months of treatment with rivaroxaban is lower when compared to placebo and that the likely advantage of an extended effect is not offset by…
There are two phases in this trial with 2 objectives:In phase I of the trial it will be assessed which dose of rivaroxaban is the most safe and effective (most optimal benefit:risk profile). In phase II this dose will be further investigated to…
The objective of this study is to demonstrate (1) the superior efficacy of VTE prophylaxis with oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily administered for 35 ± 4 days to SC enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (OD) administered for 10 ± 4 days in men and women aged…
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether rivaroxaban in addition to standard care reduces the risk of the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in subjects with a recent ACS compared with…
For the Einstein-DVT evaluation. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate whether rivaroxaban is at least as effective as enoxaparin/VKA in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) without symptomatic…
The primary efficacy objective is to assess the incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism.The secondary efficacy objective is to assess the incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and asymptomatic deterioration on…
The overall objective of this trial will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clinical surveillance without anticoagulation in low-risk patients with isolated SSPE. Objective 1: To compare the frequency of symptomatic, recurrent venous…
Primary objectives:*To determine whether rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (bid) + aspirin 100 mg once daily (od) compared with aspirin 100 mg od reduces therisk of a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in subjects with…
Despite continuous improvements in the medical management of pediatric patients with CHD, the risk of thrombotic events remains an important complication for pediatric patients following the Fontan procedure.The National Heart, Lung and Blood…
The primary objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of rivaroxaban 10 mg versus enoxaparin 4000 IU relevant to the occurrence of major VTEs up until the end of the treatment (for example, cast or splint removal). The power of the study…
The primary aim of the GENPAD study is to evaluate the ability of genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment to reduce adverse clinical events related to arterial thrombosis in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Secondary aims are to evaluate…
Primary objective:• To assess, in healthy subjects, the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of PCC in the presence and absence of selected DOACs.Secondary objectives:• To assess, in healthy subjects, the safety and tolerability of PCC in the presence…
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the impact of a strategy aimed at switching INR-guided VKA management to a NOAC-based treatment strategy is superior in terms of the occurrence of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding…