8 results
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate in patients suffering from diffuse cutaneous SSc (DcSSc) the effect of 800mg and 1200mg IVA337 daily on the skin compared to placebo. The modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS) will be used to determine…
Safety Lead-inIn patients with BRAF V600E mutant (BRAFV600E) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC):Primary: • Assess the safety/tolerability of the combination of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximabSecondary:• Assess the activity of encorafenib +…
Sub-study APhase 1b:To assess the DLT rate and estimate the MTD of sasanlimab in combination with encorafenib and binimetinib to determine the RP2D for the combination. Phase 2:To assess the durable ORR of sasanlimab in combination with encorafenib…
To characterize the safety and tolerability.1. To describe the available RFS data by treatment arm.2. To describe the available DMFS data by treatment arm.3. To describe-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) bytreatment arm.
The main purpose of this study is to assess investigate the effect of encorafenib and binimetinib (the study drugs) on the activity of other common drugs and the effect of modafinil on the activity of encorafenib. The study will also look at the…
To determine whether treatment with LGX818 plus MEK162 prolongs progression free survival (PFS) compared with vemurafenib, and/or whether treatment with LGX818 prolongs PFS compared with vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutant locally advanced…
The primary objective is to prospectively assess whether a sequential approach with an induction period of 12 weeks with encorafenib + binimetinib followed by an immunotherapy combination with nivolumab + ipilimumab improves Progression Free…
Comparing the efficacy of encorafenib and cetuximab plus pembrolizumab (triplet group [group A]) vs. pembrolizumab (control group [group B]).Assessing the overall safety and tolerability of group A vs. group B.Assessing the efficacy of group A vs.…