8 results
EFFICACY OBJECTIVESWithin each cohort, the study has the following co-primary efficacy objectives:· Assessing early efficacy during the Maintenance Treatment Phase based on a 20%reduction in tumour size after 2 months of treatment· Evaluating PFSThe…
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of atezo + cobi + vem compared with placebo plus cobimetinib plus vemurafenib (placebo+ cobi + vem) in patients with previously untreated, BRAFV600 mutation*positive, metastatic or…
To evaluate the efficacy of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab, as measured by the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review
Primary objective:- To compare efficacy of induction vemurafenib + cobimetinib followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab (Arm A) versus upfront ipilimumab + nivolumab treatment (Arm B).Secondary Objectives- To describe duration of response and overall…
To test whether the proportion of patients in remission during the last 6 months of follow up is higher for a T2T strategy compared to a T2S stop strategy.
To compare the effect of ZIM and DOM in combination with chemotherapy relative to PEMBRO in combination with chemotherapy (Group A versus Group B) on:• Progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1 as assessed by blinded independent…
Study MX39795 will compare the efficacy and safety of molecularly-guided therapy versusstandard platinum-containing chemotherapy in patients with poor prognosis cancer of unknown primary site(CUP; non-specific subset) who have achieved disease…
The GO TEST OVERTURE study aims to demonstrate the superiority of the Treat to Target management strategy over a Treat to Avoid Symptoms approach in terms of clinical remission of gout symptoms.