8 results
To compare progression-free survival in subjects with relapsed multiple myeloma who are receiving CRd vs PFS in subjects receiving Rd alone.
Primary Objective:To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of transplant-ineligible subjects with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are treated withcarfilzomib, melphalan, and prednisone (CMP) versus those treated with bortezomib (Velcade…
Primary objectives- Evaluate the efficacy, defined as PFS, of pomalidomide maintenance plus dexamethasone versus pomalidomide maintenance in patients who responded (>= PR) to the combination of pomalidomide (POM), carfilzomib (CAR) and low…
The primary objective of the study is :To assess MRD negativity rate by NGF after 9 cycles for all eligible ITT patients of KRd versus Rd in patients with high-risk SMMSecondary objectives:• To assess MRD (NGF) negativity rate after 4 cycles of…
Primary Objective: • To compare efficacy of once-weekly KRd (56 mg/m2 ) to twice-weekly KRd (27 mg/m2) in subjects with RRMM with 1 to 3 prior lines of therapyKey Secondary Objectives: • To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatment…
Primary objective-To compare rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity by NGS between Isa-KRd and KRd in post ASCT consolidation treatment.Key secondary objectives- Rate of MRD negativity after induction by NGS- To compare progression-free…
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy (rate of very good partial response [VGPR] or better as best response as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria) of daratumumab subcutaneous (Dara-SC) in combination…
Primary objective:To improve the PET negativity after two cycles of immuno-chemotherapyPrimary efficacy endpoint:PET 2 assessment according to the five-point scale Deauville criteria (Negative = 1, 2, 3 and Positive = 4, 5), based on central review.…