36 results
Primary Objective: To compare Overall Survival (OS) of subjects with Stage IV/recurrent NSCLC of squamous histology who have been randomized to ipilimumab in addition to paclitaxel and carboplatin versus placebo in addition to paclitaxel and…
Main Objective:Phase II part: Efficacy of cabazitaxel compared to vinflunine in terms of improved objective response rate (ORR) of subjects with metastatic or locally advanced previously treated TCCU.Phase III part: Efficacy of cabazitaxel compared…
The aim of this study is the efficacy of a simplified triple regimen at an energy setting of 12 J/cm2 instead of 2x2x15 J/cm2, without a cleaning phase in between, and its effect on the rate of stenosis and overall complications when using the Barrx…
The main objective is to determine whether cabazitaxel or prolonged infusional ifosfamide demonstrate sufficient antitumor activity (as measured by progression free survival at 12 weeks) in pre-treated patients with metastatic or inoperable locally…
To compare OS in patients with previously untreated Stage IIIc, N3 (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving dacarbazine plus 10mg/kg ipilimumab (MDX-010) vs. dacarbazine with placebo.
The primary objective is to evaluate if patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation followed by consolidation treatment (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have a better outcome in terms of progression-free survival (time…
Primary objectives:To establish a safe and effective dosing schedule for repeated administration of Rhenium-188 HEDP combined with Cabazitaxel in order to proceed with a Randomised Phase 2 trial designed to determine the clinical value of Rhenium-…
The primary objective of the study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) of REGN2810 (cemiplimab) plus ipilimumab combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as REGN2810/ipi) and REGN2810 plus 2 cycles only of platinum-based doublet…
To compare the overall survival of ipilimumab monotherapy at doses of 3 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg in subjects with previously treated or untreated unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer who are no longer responding to hormone therapy (castration resistant) and who have not yet received chemotherapy live longer (overall survival) when…
The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients with castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after receiving docetaxel treatment, when they are treated with bone directed radiotherapy plus Ipilimumab…
Primary Objective:To investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in the tumor environment and the periphery on biomarker measures such as circulating T cell subsets (activated and memory T…
Primary Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) of subjects randomized to ipilimumab in addition toplatinum and etoposide (Arm A) to that of subjects randomized to placebo in addition to platinum andetoposide (Arm B) in subjects with newly…
The aim of this phase IVI, randomized, open-label study is to compare the efficacy of cabazitaxel versus an AR targeted agent, in patients previously treated with docetaxel and likely to have primary resistance to AR targeted agents.
Primary Objective:The primary objective is to compare the incidence of drug-related Grade 3 - 5 AEs of N3I1 to N1I3 in subjects with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma.Secondary Objective:• To evaluate the ORR, as determined…
The aim of the study is to compare the Overall Response Rate (ORR) and assess Duration of Response (DoR) of the treatment of nivolumab in combination with ipilumumab vs. nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab placebo, as determined by a blinded…
Primary Objectives:• To compare progression free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS) of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin regimen as first…
The aim of the study is to compare overall survival (OS) and Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)-assessed progression free survival (PFS), of nivolumab, and nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab, versus placebo in subjects with ED-SCLC…
1. To evaluate progression-free-survival (PFS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.2. To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced MEL receiving either Pembrolizumab or IPI.
The study will look at patients with chemotherapy-naive Stage IV or recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The research aims to compare a new drug called nivolumab OR nivolumab with ipilimumab (another cancer drug) OR nivolumab combined with…