9 results
Th**is study will compare sequential mifepristone and misoprostol (*M&M*) treatment versus misoprostol treatment alone, which is currently the standard medical treatment in the Netherlands.
To evaluate the benefit of Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in nulliparous and postmenopausal women regarding the reduction of pain
To assess in term pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix (Bishop score < 6, Appendix1) the effectiveness of induction of labour with a transcervical Foley catheter as compared to induction with misoprostol.
Primary Objective* To assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy (in terms of change in DAS28 [using C-ReactiveProtein (CRP)] from baseline) of JNJ-38518168 at a dose of 100 mg/day for up to 12 weekscompared to placebo in subjects with active…
To investigate whether Misoprostol (compared to placebo) will diminish the amount of insertion failures. To investigate whether Misoprostol (compared to placebo) will diminish the amount of insertion related complications (eg. syncope, perforation…
To assess the effectiveness of misoprostol in the management of retained placenta. Will 800 micrograms of misoprostol orally reduce the need for manual removal under general anaesthesia and prove to be a safe alternative?
This study will compare sequential mifepristone and misoprostol treatment versus misoprostol treatment alone, which is currently the standard medical treatment in the Netherlands.
Is priming of the cervix, as part of induction of labour:* At home cost-effective and safe compared to the hospital?* with oral misoprostol cost-effective and safe compared to a Foley catheter?
The aim of this study is to investigate if tocolysis with atosiban in late preterm birth (30 to 34 weeks) is (cost-) effective compared with placebo in improving neonatal morbidity and mortality.