16 results
Primary Objective: Description of the 1-year overall survival after chemo-radiation therapy with or without panitumumab in irresectable carcinoma of the oesophagus. The control arm is used to validate whether the historical cohort used for…
Primary objective: to detect an increase in progression free survival (PFS*, see chapter 7.3.6) rate at 1 year in each experimental arm (mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab or panitumumab) compared to mFOLFOX6 alone arm as perioperative treatment for resectable…
The primary objectives of this study are:- To demonstrate that LCZ696 is superior to individualized medical therapy for comorbidities in reducing NT proBNP from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with HFpEF.- To demonstrate that LCZ696…
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 compared to ramipril, in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and outpatient HF (time-to-first event analysis) in post-AMI…
Primary Objectives:-To evaluate if the treatment of Low Risk HB can be reduced (Group B1)-To compare different induction treatment regimens for Intermediate risk HB (Group C)-To compare different post induction treatment regimens for High Risk HB (…
The primary objective:To compare LCZ696 to valsartan in reducing the rate of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death andtotal (first and recurrent) heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, in HF patients (NYHA Class II-IV) with preserved EF (LVEF…
Primary:- To elucidate the change in physical activity as assessed by the distance walked in meters during the 6-minute walk test between baseline and 12weeks of study drug treatment in sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril patients.- To assess changes…
To compare the efficacy of six cycles neoadjuvant PTC plus pertuzumab preceded by either three cycles of FEC-T plus pertuzumab or three cycles of PTC plus pertuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancerSecondary objectives• To describe the safety of the…
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan compared with standard of care used for treating BP in patients that have been implanted with the HM3 LVAD.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the addition of induction chemotherapy to the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer results in more R0 resections compared to treatment with neoadjuvant…
Primary objective:To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on event-free survival (EFS)Key secondary objectives:- To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on overall survival (OS)- To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on pathological complete response (pCR) rate
To evaluate the effects of LCZ696 compared to valsartan on cognitive function over 3 years in patients with HFpEF as assessed by the CogState cognitive assessment battery.
To determine whether neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by surgery improves overall survival and quality of life compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic…
Objectives of the phase II study (80 patients) are to explore the feasibility of accrual, the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy, and the radiological and histological response of colorectal PM to neoadjuvant…
To determine the median progression-free survival (PFS) and R0/1 secondary resection rate upon induction systemic treatment in colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable liver-only metastases, stratified by RAS and BRAF tumor mutation…
Investigate whether perioperative mFOLFIRINOX improves overall survival compared to adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic cancer.