9 results
Primary* To compare the efficacy (Major Molecular Response, MMR, rate at 12 months) Secondary* To compare the rate of durable MMR at 24 months in patients with a MMR at 12 months* To compare the rate, time to and duration of complete cytogenetic…
To compare progression free survival (PFS) of nilotinib and imatinib when used as initial therapy of unresectable and/or metastatic GIST in patients either who have not received prior therapy with TKIs or who have recurrent GIST after stopping…
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in spondyloarthritis
Primary* To evaluate whether the efficacy of nilotinib is superior to the control arm (as measured by progression free survivalSecondary* To compare the response rate, and time to response, duration of response, and time to tumor progression of…
To evaluate the CCyR rate at 12 months of nilotinib compared to imatinib in adult patients with Ph+ CML in CP who have a suboptimal cytogenetic response on imatinib.
Primary:• Phase I part: to define the recommended dose (RD) of nilotinib and vinblastine when used in combination• Phase II part: to evaluate the efficacy of vinblastine in combination with nilotinib (VINILO) at the RD, as compared to vinblastine…
Primary:To compare the efficacy of asciminib versus Investigator selected TKI with respect to the proportion of patients that are in Major Molecular Response at Week 48. To compare the efficacy of asciminib versus Investigator selected TKI, within…
Primary:To assess the tolerability of asciminib versus nilotinib with respect to the time to discontinuation of study treatment due to adverse event.Secondary:• Efficacy of asciminib versus nilotinib in terms of discontinuation due to lack of…
The study will investigate in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients the efficacy of NIL frontline therapy vs IM followed by switch to NIL in the case of absence of optimal response as defined by the ELN criteria