9 results
To compare the therapeutic benefit of maintenance pazopanib versus placebo after first line treatment of NSCLC.
Primary objectivesThe primary objective is to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who receive bi-monthly rotations of Pazopanib and Everolimus versus patients who receive Pazopanib as a first line treatment. Secondary…
The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of administration of aldoxorubicin compared to investigator*s choice of treatment in subjects with metastatic, locally advanced, or unresectable soft tissue sarcomas who have relapsed…
The primary objective of the phase II is to determine the progression free survival (PFS) at 1 year according to the RECIST 1.1 of the combination of pazopanib with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or…
Safety and efficacy objectives:The objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of masitinib at 6 of 7.5 mg/kg/day to imatinib at 400 or 600 mg, in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour in first line medical treatment.
Primary:To evaluate if progression-free survival from randomization to progression or death during second-line therapy (total PFS) of sorafenib followed by pazopanib is non-inferior compared to pazopanib followed by sorafenib.Secondary:1. Time from…
This phase 3 trial will test the hypothesis that ponatinib is an effective treatment for newly diagnosed CP-CML patients when compared with standard imatinib
Primary:To compare the efficacy of asciminib versus Investigator selected TKI with respect to the proportion of patients that are in Major Molecular Response at Week 48. To compare the efficacy of asciminib versus Investigator selected TKI, within…
The study will investigate in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients the efficacy of NIL frontline therapy vs IM followed by switch to NIL in the case of absence of optimal response as defined by the ELN criteria