19 results
The primary objective of this endpoint study is to evaluate the safety of tofacitinib at two doses versus TNFi; the co-primary endpoints are adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and adjudicated malignancies excluding non-melanoma…
Primary Objective* To demonstrate the efficacy of tofacitinib in inducing remission in subjects with moderately to severely active UC.Secondary Objectives* To evaluate the safety and tolerability of tofacitinib in subjects with moderately to…
1. To compare the efficacy of tofacitinib, in doses of 2 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg BID versus placebo on the ASAS20 response rate at Week 12 in subjects with active AS that have had an inadequate response to previous treatment.2. To estimate the placebo-…
The overall goal of this RCT is to compare the efficacy of 90Y-RE to TACE-DEB, for patients with intermediate stage HCC. Time to progression, overall survival, tumor response, adverse events, treatment related effect on total liver function, quality…
Primary Objectives:- To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + dCRT compared with placebo + dCRT in all randomized patients based on PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR)- To assess the efficacy of durvalumab + dCRT compared with placebo + dCRT in…
- To assess the safety and tolerability and to determine the RP2D of T-DXd plus durvalumab in combination with cisplatin, carboplatin or pemetrexed
The study objectives and endpoints described below will be evaluated for the following treatment regimens:• Arm A: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab + ipilimumab maintenance• Arm B: Nivolumab + CCRT followed by nivolumab maintenance• Arm C:…
In this study, we want to learn more about the effect and safety of Ceralasertib plus Durvalumab on the inhibition of tumour growth, and also to better understand NSCLC and associated health problems.We compare the effect and safety of Ceralasertib…
This Phase III study, the administration of durvalumab + chemotherapy prior to surgery, followed by administration of durvalumab after surgery, will be investigated in patients with resectable Stages II and III NSCLC. The efficacy of durvalumab will…
This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab adjuvant therapy compared to placebo in patients with completely resected stage II-III NSCLC who have undergone curative intent therapy (complete resection ± neoadjuvant…
To evaluate PFS in participants treated with cCRT plus M7824 followed by M7824 or cCRT plus placebo followed by Durvalumab
The standard first-line therapy for mUC patients is platinum-based chemotherapy, most commonly cisplatin. For patients that progress during or after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD(L)1 therapy can be used, showing durable responses in a subset…
The overall objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple therapies in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, Stage III NSCLC who are selected according to biomarker status as identified by tissue-based testing.…
This study is evaluating the preliminary efficacy of UV1-olaparib-durvalumab combination against both olaparib as monotherapy and olaparib-durvalumab combination in maintenance after platinum combination therapy for BRCAwt patients with relapsed…
(1) Main objective:Safety Run-In (SRI):To assess the safety and tolerability of durvalumab + tremelimumab + EV in participants with MIBC who are ineligible for cisplatin or who refuse cisplatinMain Study: To compare the efficacy of durvalumab +…
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation maintenance treatment consisting of atezolizumab and tiragolumab compared with durvalumab in patients with locally advanced, unresectable Stage III NSCLC who have received at least…
The research hypothesis for this study is that concurrent durvalumab plus SoC chemotherapy will be more effective than placebo plus SoC chemotherapy for the treatment of MRD+ patients who have undergone complete resection of stage II-III NSCLC when…
Primary:• 3 year recurrence free survival (RFS), in patients with MMRd HREC Secondary:• RFS (median and at 5 years)• OS (median, 3yr, 5yr)• Vaginal RFS, pelvic RFS, distant metastasis free-survival (median, 3-year, 5-year)• Disease-specific…
Primary objective:To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on event-free survival (EFS)Key secondary objectives:- To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on overall survival (OS)- To compare Arm A relative to Arm B on pathological complete response (pCR) rate