8 results
Primary: To assess the efficacy of treatment with 300 mg or 600 mg of intravenous (IV) zanamivir twice daily compared to 75 mg of oral oseltamivir twice daily on time to clinical response. Secondary: reduction in viral load from nasopharyngeal swabs…
Primary:To assess the efficacy of treatment with IV danirixin twice daily given with oral oseltamivir compared to oral oseltamivir twice daily on time to clinical response (TTCR)Secondary:Time to respiratory response (TTRR), clinical measures of…
Primary: To assess the antiviral efficacy of triple combination antiviral drug (TCAD) therapy(i.e. amantadine and ribavirin co-administered with oseltamivir) compared to oseltamivirmonotherapy in immunocompromised subjects diagnosed with Influenza…
If proven (cost)effective, without inducing antivral resistance, oseltamivir could have considerable benefits in this setting, although constraints relating to implementation need to be addressed as well. If not (cost)effective if this fragile…
Primary: To determine the safety and tolerability of TCAD administered orally to immunocompromised patients diagnosed with influenza ASecondary: To assess the antiviral effect, the speed of symptom resolution, and the influenza complication rate of…
primary objective of the trial is to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy of 4-6 cycles of BrECADD compared to 4-6 cycles of escalated BEACOPP, each followed by radiotherapy on PET-positive residual lesions, in terms of progression free survival (…
The primary objective is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of JNJ-63623872 in combination with oseltamivir in elderly subjects (aged 65 to *85 years) compared to adults (aged 18 to *64 years) with influenza A infection.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab among subjects with relapsed or refractory CD30-positive (CD30 expression >=1%) or CD30 <1% (CD30 expression <1%) DLBCL.